AI is no longer just a tech buzzword, it’s strutting down fashion’s runway. From hyper-realistic virtual models to fully AI-generated collections, the technology is not just experimenting on the sidelines; it’s sitting front row. The perks are undeniable: cost savings, faster time-to-market, endless creative possibilities. But as with any disruptive force, fashion’s AI makeover comes with a laundry list of ethical questions.
Welcome to the AI-Fashion Ethics FAQ, the industry’s unofficial handbook for navigating ownership, consent, and disclosure in this brave new digital atelier. Think of it as the fine print you can’t afford to skip.
1. Can I train my AI model on runway images I found online?
Short answer: no—unless you enjoy lawsuits as accessories.
Training on copyrighted runway shots without permission is a copyright infringement waiting to happen. Those images belong to photographers, media outlets, or fashion houses, not the open web.
- EU: The AI Act is all about transparency, requiring proof that your training data was lawfully sourced.
- US: Getty Images v. Stability AI is the cautionary tale—scraped images aren’t fair use.
Action: Buy or build licensed datasets. Anything else? Out of fashion.
2. Do I need consent if my AI avatar looks like a real model?
Absolutely. Treat digital doubles the way you would real talent.
New York’s Fashion Workers Act (2025) demands written permission for replicas. States like California and Tennessee have similar rules.
Action: Add a “synthetic likeness” clause to model releases. No excuses.
3. Do I need to disclose when my campaign uses AI-generated images?
Sometimes—depending on where your campaign runs.
- EU: The AI Act requires clear labeling of AI-generated visuals.
- US: More than 40 states now demand disclaimers for “materially deceptive” ads.
Action: Keep it simple. Try this line: “This image was created with AI-generated virtual models; no real people were photographed.”
4. Who owns copyright in a pure AI image?
Here’s the plot twist: no one.
EU and US regulators agree—if a human didn’t make meaningful creative choices, copyright doesn’t exist.
Action: Keep a changelog of your edits. Cropping, colour grading, and layout tweaks might just secure your authorship.
5. How can educators use AI without a legal migraine?
AI in fashion schools is inevitable, but legality doesn’t have to be complicated.
Checklist for classrooms:
- Use licensed or public-domain datasets.
- Credit the AI tool, label the output.
- Review UNESCO’s AI bias guidelines.
It’s about teaching the next generation of designers not just how to create, but how to create responsibly.
The Cheat Sheet
- Licence your data and skip the shady web scrapes.
- Get likeness consent: digital models are people too.
- Label AI images, because transparency is chic.
- Log your edits: your human touch might be your copyright ticket.
In short: respect the creators, respect the subjects, respect the audience. That’s modern AI fashion ethics in one line.
Bias Isn’t Just an IT Problem, It’s a Fashion Problem
At The Fabricant, the mission is inclusivity. The goal? AI outputs that represent the full spectrum of human identity, different cultures, body types, genders, and aesthetics. But perfection isn’t a one-click render. Bias testing is ongoing, and your feedback matters. If you spot bias in an AI output, speak up—because the future of fashion should fit everyone.
ALSO READ: REWIND OR RESET? WILL NEW CREATIVE DIRECTORS ARCHIVE OR INNOVATE?
